On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 05:32:28PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Opportunistically pass the spte instead of the pfn, as the API is clearly
> about removing an spte.
>From my perspective, "remove_external_spte" means removing an external SPTE 
>(not
a mirror SPTE). So passing in pfn_for_gfn seems reasonable as well.

Additionally, passing in the pfn eliminates potential concerns about incorrect
spte content.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 48598d017d6f..7e92aebd07e8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1855,8 +1855,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
>                                void *external_spt);
>  
>       /* Update external page table from spte getting removed, and flush TLB. 
> */
> -     int (*remove_external_spte)(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, enum pg_level 
> level,
> -                                 kvm_pfn_t pfn_for_gfn);
> +     void (*remove_external_spte)(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, enum pg_level 
> level,
> +                                  u64 spte);
Also update set_external_spte?

        /* Update the external page table from spte getting set. */             
   
        int (*set_external_spte)(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, enum pg_level 
level,
                                 kvm_pfn_t pfn_for_gfn);


Reply via email to