On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:40:54 +0100 David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 10:37 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Zero means no IRQ. Any platform with bits of code left over exposing IRQ > > 0 is already not supported by lots of driver code including libata. > > ...and must implement some kind of interrupt remapping crap just to work > around this bogus design decision. I'll leave you to argue with Linus about that, but since that was the decision back in 2005 (for good C reasons) we can safely rely on it. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
