> On 27 Apr 2026, at 11:26 AM, Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2026 at 03:09:30PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> In redhat perftool testsuite, observed fail for this test:
>>    -- [ FAIL ] -- perf_sched :: test_timehist :: --with-summary (output 
>> regexp parsing)
>> 
>> This led to analysis of "perf sched timehist" summary options.
>> 
>>  # perf sched record -a -o ./perf.data -- sleep 0.1
>>   This will record using perf sched record
>> 
>> perf sched timeliest has two options "-s" and "-S"
>>  # perf sched -i ./perf.data timehist -S
>> -S : Captures summary also at the end
>> 
>>  # perf sched -i ./perf.data timehist -s
>> -s : Captures only summary
>> 
>> The test saves -s result which has only summary and compares with
>> summary which comes at the end from -S . Since there is a difference
>> in these two, test fails.
>> 
>> Checking the behaviour change in -S and -s results, difference is:
>> 
>>                  rcu_sched[16]       2          4        0.013      0.001    
>>    0.003       0.006   33.23       0
>>               migration/11[73]       2          1        0.006      0.006    
>>    0.006       0.006    0.00       0
>>                migration/3[33]       2          1        0.006      0.006    
>>    0.006       0.006    0.00       0
>> -               :216753[216753]      -1          1        0.041      0.041   
>>     0.041       0.041    0.00       0
>> +                 sleep[216753]      -1          1        0.041      0.041   
>>     0.041       0.041    0.00       0
>>                migration/8[58]       2          1        0.005      0.005    
>>    0.005       0.005    0.00       0
>>            NetworkManager[811]       1          2        0.089      0.028    
>>    0.044       0.060   36.06       0
>>               migration/13[83]       2          1        0.005      0.005    
>>    0.005       0.005    0.00       0
>> 
>> Here 216753 is pid for sleep which is a zombie process. This is
>> happening in latest kernel due to an update in "-S" result.
>> In -S, the process name appears in the results "sleep[216753]",
>> where as in the -s, only pid is present in the summary result
>> ":216753[216753]".
>> 
>> After commit 39f473f6d0b2 ("perf sched timehist: decode process names
>> of processes in zombie state")
>> for -S option, if process name is using pid, it uses different way to
>> set it. So that we get the process name and not just Pid.
>> 
>> This change went in only for timehist_print_sample() function.
>> Add this improvement in generic place so that even -s option (which
>> captures summary) also will have meaningful information.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <[email protected]>
> 
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
> 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
Hi,

Can we please have this pulled in, if the patch looks fine ?

Thanks
Athira
> 
>> ---
>> tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
>> index 555247568e7a..ee1b89a6af50 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
>> @@ -2197,11 +2197,6 @@ static void timehist_print_sample(struct perf_sched 
>> *sched,
>> printf(" ");
>> }
>> 
>> - if (!thread__comm_set(thread)) {
>> -                const char *prev_comm = evsel__strval(evsel, sample, 
>> "prev_comm");
>> -                thread__set_comm(thread, prev_comm, sample->time);
>> -        }
>> -
>> printf(" %-*s ", comm_width, timehist_get_commstr(thread));
>> 
>> if (sched->show_prio)
>> @@ -2890,6 +2885,15 @@ static int timehist_sched_change_event(const struct 
>> perf_tool *tool,
>> itr->last_thread = NULL;
>> }
>> 
>> + /*
>> +  * If the process name is not set for the thread, use "prev_comm"
>> +  * to set it. Otherwise the sched summary will have just pid information
>> +  */
>> + if (!thread__comm_set(thread)) {
>> + const char *prev_comm = evsel__strval(evsel, sample, "prev_comm");
>> + thread__set_comm(thread, prev_comm, sample->time);
>> + }
>> +
>> if (!sched->summary_only)
>> timehist_print_sample(sched, evsel, sample, &al, thread, t, state);
>> }
>> -- 
>> 2.47.3



Reply via email to