On 04.06.2026 20:24, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 08:27:36PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >> I already sent a v6 in the hope of getting this merged for the next >> merge window. Should I send a v7, or would you prefer that I do the >> rename on top of v6? > I think it is too late for such a major change, but this should be > imaginged to be for rc2ish next cycle. You also have to spell out how > the pkvm patch will get sequenced as well, it would be best to push > that it gets picked up right away.
I would like to give this a bit of time in linux-next so it is a bit too late for v7.2, but before merging it I would also like to have this code reviewed by someone with confidential computing knowledge. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland
