>>>> * Omit the local variable “size” (for another memory allocation).
>>>
>>> Please remove this change, not related to the intention of the patch.
>> What does hinder to perform the required size determination as a direct 
>> parameter
>> for a kzalloc() call?
> 
> Nothing, but it's a different change. On top of this, it's just churning
> the code without an added benefit.
It influences development concerns also according to preferred variable scopes.

Regards,
Markus

Reply via email to