Thank you Ian for the review, glad it looks good!
Thanks,
Tanushree Shah
On 05/08/26 07:57, Ian Rogers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 7:07 PM Ian Rogers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2026 at 11:08 AM Tanushree Shah <[email protected]> wrote:
...
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/[email protected]/
Thanks again Tanushree for pursuing this. I see on sashiko.dev that
sashiko couldn't review the v2 patches because they failed to apply:
https://sashiko.dev/#/log/baseline/53604/2
The SHA of perf-tools-next that sashiko.dev was trying was
d04ef71492fad7230d474efe33d05f4c0563d409, which corresponds to "perf
machine: Check snprintf truncation for guest kallsyms path," added 4
days ago:
https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/commit/?h=perf-tools-next&id=d04ef71492fad7230d474efe33d05f4c0563d409
Could you rebase the patches so that we can benefit from the Sashiko review?
Fwiw, I went through the individual patches in case I could give some
useful early feedback. Everything looks great, and thanks for adding
the test!
Thanks,
Ian
