On Sat, 26 Sep 2026 10:40:56 -0700 mingming cao wrote: > Hi Jacub, There's no c in my name, sir. I wonder why people do that.
> I noticed this v7 series is flagged red on patchwork. The apply failure > is due to a dependency on my own [PATCH net 0/2] (Message-ID: > [email protected]) sent the same day — kept > separate per your earlier feedback to peel fixes out of feature series. > Both touch ibmveth_open() in the same region, and the net pair is not > yet in net-next. > > The v7 MQ series is based on net-next 161ea2d4f2a7 (2026-09-24). The > fixes are already subsumed by MQ patches 3 and 6. > > Shall I wait and rebase MQ once the net pair lands in net-next, or send > a v8 now with the net pair folded in? Happy to do either. Sorry for the delay, hint: please put just me in the To: if you want me to spot the email sooner. We get 400+ messages to the list every day, I'm only reading the list as I review :( To answer your question - please hold off with reposting until the fixes are in net-next. We won't merge the patches if they conflict with fixes.
