On Tue, 15 Sep 2026 09:44:38 +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> This one has been bugging me for a while. Five comments and doc lines
> name a VCPU_RUN ioctl (KVM_VCPU_RUN in book3s_hv.c, VCPU RUN in
> kvm_host.h). The ioctl that enters the guest is KVM_RUN.
>
> The patches are independent and split by tree, one each for generic
> KVM, KVM/arm64 and Book3S HV, so each can go through its own
> maintainer. Nothing else in the tree refers to the ioctl by a wrong
> name.
>
> [...]
Applied to next, thanks!
[1/3] KVM: Fix comments that refer to the non-existent VCPU_RUN ioctl
commit: 8233000034a630432a7da0311d94e8725207a095
[2/3] KVM: arm64: Fix references to the non-existent VCPU_RUN ioctl
commit: 0ab1034969130967bda8e6eab5b8dd6745604f1b
[3/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix comment naming a non-existent KVM_VCPU_RUN ioctl
commit: 6ce8b5c0effb227f5625b35965c0f74c0e953efb
Cheers,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
