On Jan 12, 2009, at 12:24 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 02:42:38PM -0600, Milton Miller wrote:
Follwing this mail are 5 patches for kexec userspace and two for the
kernel. The first fixes an array overflow and the second updates
userspace to the merged 2.6.28 kdump support. The remaining are
cleanups and warning fixes, including one for the common code.
The two patchs for the kernel are independent.
Hi all,
sorry to be a bit slow in responding, this email landed just
as I was leaving for a weeks holiday.
No problem, I figured as much.
The kexec-tools patches seem reasonable to me and I'm happy to merge
what I
think are the latest versions - thanks Michael for your review.
Milton, here are the Subjects, Dates and Message-Ids of what I have in
my
queue. If you could confirm this or repost that would be great.
#1
Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools v2] ppc64: always check number of ranges
when adding them
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:33:50 -0600
Message-ID: <1231418030_141...@mercury.realtime.net>
#2
Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 2/5] ppc64: update kdump for 2.6.28
relocatable kernel
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:42 -0600
Message-Id: <kexec-29-1-2r.milt...@bga.com>
#3
Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 3/5] ppc64: segments may be reordered
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:45 -0600
Message-Id: <kexec-29-1-3r.milt...@bga.com>
#4
Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 4/5] ppc64: cleanups
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:48 -0600
Message-Id: <kexec-29-1-4r.milt...@bga.com>
#5
Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 5/5] entry wants to be void *
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:51 -0600
Message-Id: <kexec-29-1-5r.milt...@bga.com>
Based on the subjects, yes, those are the lastest versions.
And I assume you saw Mohan's tested message.
Thanks,
milton
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
