On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 21:06:57 +0300 Anton Vorontsov <avoront...@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> FSL eSDHC hosts don't provide clocks bits in the capabilities register, > instead we're getting clocks values from the device tree. > > There is somewhat similar change[1] from Ben Dooks, the change adds > callbacks for getting the clocks. But for eSDHC the callbacks are > superfluous, since the clocks are static. > > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/2/157 > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avoront...@ru.mvista.com> > --- As I told Ben, I prefer if we stick to the standard as much as possible. So no external info unless the register is set to zero. And since we know the Samsung chip needs callbacks, we might as well add them here. It's not like this is a performance critical path. Rgds -- -- Pierre Ossman WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end encryption.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
