2009/2/12 David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:10:58PM +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> > 2009/2/12 Pieter <phenn...@vastech.co.za>
> >
> > > Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> > > > Warning (reg_format): "reg" property in
> > > > /local...@f0010100/fl...@0,0/partit...@ff800000 has invalid length
> (8
> > > > JM
> > > You are missing some definitions, The #address-cells and #size-cells =
> <1>;
> > > tis is a snippet of teh dts i defined for my board.
> > >
> > > fl...@0,0 {
> > > #address-cells = <1>;
> > > #size-cells = <1>;
> > > compatible = "cfi-flash";
> > > reg = <0x0 0x0 0x08000000>;
> > > bank-width = <4>;
> > > device-width = <1>;
> > >
> > > /* set flash partition to correspond tu mtd parts in
> > > u-boot*/
> > > /* 0xf8000000 */
> > > partit...@0x0 {
> > > label = "factory-image";
> > > reg = <0x00000000 0x01000000>;
> > > };
> > > /* 0xf9000000 */
> > > partit...@0x01000000 {
> > > label = "app-image-1";
> > > reg = <0x01000000 0x01000000>;
> > > };
> > > cheers pieter
> > >
> >
> > Hi do have these definitions, at a higher level:
>
> The address-cells and size-cells definitions are not inherited. They
> cover only the immediate children of the node where they appear.
> Otherwise the default values apply (address-cells == 2, size-cells ==
> 1), which are not right for your case.
>
> --
> David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
> david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_
> _other_
> | _way_ _around_!
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson <http://www.ozlabs.org/%7Edgibson>
>
OK, so, after having tested, I can't see any changes when booting.
I do not have more mtd in /proc/mtd.
JM
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
