On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Robert Schwebel <r.schwe...@pengutronix.de> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 09:33:16PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jon Smirl <jonsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Would it be easier to get Pengutronix to release a new u-boot for >> > the pcm030? I'm using U-Boot 1.2.0-mpc5200b-tiny-2 (Apr 17 2007 - >> > 11:49:20). >> >> Only if it is a chip IO setup problem (like port_config or clock >> setup). Otherwise the kernel should be setting up the PCI controller >> correctly. Regardless, I don't think the kernel should be crashing >> when PCI is in a funny state. > > Ack; I didn't follow the thread in detail, but if possible I'd like to > avoid bootloader updates; it's quite a lot of effort because there are > thousends of devices in the field, not to mention the whole > qualification mechanics at Phytec.
On a pcm030 1245-1 u-boot-1.2.0-mpc5200b-tiny-3, boots ok and PCI is initialized correctly. The readme is not clear that tiny-3 should be used on 1245.1 hardware. http://www.pengutronix.de/oselas/bsp/phytec/download/phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny/Readme This phrase implies the tiny-3 should only be used on 1245.2 hardware. "U-Boot binary to be used with OSELAS.BSP-Phytec-phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny-6 (board revision 1245.2)" Where is the difference between the 1245.0, 1245.1 and 1245.2 hardware documented? > > Wolfram can check the issue when being back in the office. > > rsc > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > -- Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev