On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:40:12PM -0500, Mike Wolf wrote: > Resending. the patch was munged last time. > > > Oprofile is changing the naming it is using for the compatibility modes. > Instead of having compat-power<x>, oprofile will go to family naming > convention and use compat-v<x>. Currently only compat-v1 will be > defined.
Compat V1 of what? powerpc64? IBM powerpc64 PMC? The performance monitors are not architected, to give them a version number without vendor information seems weird. Also, doesn't this break compatibility with existing userspace tools? -Olof _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev