Kumar, David has pulled my phylib changes into his -next tree. However, some of the driver changes have been compile tested only due to lack of hardware. Who can I ask to test the changes to the following files?
arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/ep8248e.c | 9 +- drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c | 69 +-- drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c | 29 +- drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-fec.c | 26 +- drivers/net/ucc_geth.c | 47 +- drivers/net/ucc_geth.h | 2 +- Thanks, g. On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:54 AM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> > Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:52:34 -0600 > >> This series adds common code for reading PHY connection data out of >> the OpenFirmware device tree. This simplifies the network drivers >> which use the device tree and which currently implement their own >> solutions for reading the PHY data out of the device tree directly. >> >> I would like to see this series, or at least the core changes (1-4) >> plus the tested drivers (5-8 & 12, but #12 is a new driver and it >> may need more review), go into -next for 2.6.31. >> >> Due to dependencies, I think it is easiest if all of them go in via the >> same tree. David, are you willing to merge them via yours? Four of the >> patches are outside of drivers/net (patches 1 and 4 touch drivers/of/, >> and patches 9 & 10 touch arch/powerpc), but I personally have no issues >> if those changes go through you. I just need to double check with BenH. > > I've applied all of these patches to net-next-2.6, thanks. > >> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 next-net > > You know, if you had actually based this tree on net-next-2.6 > I could have pulled from it. I actually tried, and I got a > lot of upstream stuff I wasn't ready to get in that tree just > yet :-/ > -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev