* Markus Gutschke (顧孟勤) <mar...@google.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:23, Linus Torvalds
> <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is
> > potentially a 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody
> > actually _uses_ seccomp. It does seem to be enabled in at least
> > Fedora kernels, but it might not be used anywhere.
>
> In the Linux version of Google Chrome, we are currently working on
> code that will use seccomp for parts of our sandboxing solution.
That's a pretty interesting usage. What would be fallback mode you
are using if the kernel doesnt have seccomp built in? Completely
non-sandboxed? Or a ptrace/PTRACE_SYSCALL based sandbox?
Ingo
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
