David Howells <[email protected]> writes: > kernel mailz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> asm("sync"); > > Isn't gcc free to discard this as it has no dependencies, no indicated side > effects, and isn't required to be kept? I think this should probably be: > > asm volatile("sync");
An asm with no outputs is considered to be volatile. Ian _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
