On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:32:33AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > I was also wondering, was this workaround ever required in a released > chip - or was it just dev samples? If it's the latter, do we still need > to carry it at all?
It's needed on all versions of hardware but for slightly different reasons. I had to research it when the discussion came up, since the first time I used this workaround it was needed for a different erratum. But yes, it is there in shipping products -- I was usually pretty careful not to merge unneeded patches. -Olof _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
