From: Jiajun Wu <b06...@freescale.com>

Parameter order for using mk_ic_value(count, time) was reversed,
the patch fixes this.

Signed-off-by: Jiajun Wu <b06...@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Yang <le...@freescale.com>
---
 drivers/net/gianfar_ethtool.c |   10 ++++------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/gianfar_ethtool.c
index 2a7edfa..3109f4b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gianfar_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gianfar_ethtool.c
@@ -373,9 +373,8 @@ static int gfar_scoalesce(struct net_device *dev, struct 
ethtool_coalesce *cvals
                return -EINVAL;
        }
 
-       priv->rxic = mk_ic_value(
-               gfar_usecs2ticks(priv, cvals->rx_coalesce_usecs),
-               cvals->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
+       priv->rxic = mk_ic_value(cvals->rx_max_coalesced_frames,
+               gfar_usecs2ticks(priv, cvals->rx_coalesce_usecs));
 
        /* Set up tx coalescing */
        if ((cvals->tx_coalesce_usecs == 0) ||
@@ -397,9 +396,8 @@ static int gfar_scoalesce(struct net_device *dev, struct 
ethtool_coalesce *cvals
                return -EINVAL;
        }
 
-       priv->txic = mk_ic_value(
-               gfar_usecs2ticks(priv, cvals->tx_coalesce_usecs),
-               cvals->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
+       priv->txic = mk_ic_value(cvals->tx_max_coalesced_frames,
+               gfar_usecs2ticks(priv, cvals->tx_coalesce_usecs));
 
        gfar_write(&priv->regs->rxic, 0);
        if (priv->rxcoalescing)
-- 
1.5.6.3

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to