On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 04:08:49PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:45:06PM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:06:30AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: [snip] > >> >+ UART0: ser...@ef600400 { > >> >+ device_type = "serial"; > >> >+ compatible = "ns16550"; > >> >+ reg = <0xef600400 0x00000008>; > >> >+ virtual-reg = <0xef600400>; > >> >+ clock-frequency = <0>; /* Filled in by zImage */ > >> >+ current-speed = <0x9600>; > >> > >> Just a question, but is the baud supposed to be 38400 or 9600? At first > >> glance > >> it almost seems like a typo :). > > > >It's supposed to be 38400 baud, hence the explicit 0x in front. (I lost > >count of the number of times I saw '38400' listed in various dts > >files...) > > Cool. Just checking.
Um.. except, surely it's clearer to just list 38400 in decimal, rather than 0x9600 which people are very likely to misread as 9600. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev