On Sunday 09 August 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > Also, approaches such as [1] can make use of this > > > extended infrastructure instead of putting the CPU to an arbitrary C-state > > > when it is offlined, thereby providing the system administrator a rope to > > > hang > > > himself with should he feel the need to do so. > > I didn't see the reason why administrator needs to know which state offline > > cpu > > should stay. Don't know about powerpc side, but in x86 side, it appears > > deepest > > C-state is already preferred. > > > > Agreed, deepest c-state is always best, there's no need to make it > configurable.
Unless it doesn't work. Rafael _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
