* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> > Ben, what's your preference? I waited for your reaction with these
> > bits, i.e. they are not in tip:core/iommu yet.
>
> Oh I though they were... discard my previous private mail about
> missing Ack's then :-)
>
> I'll review them more in depth hopefully tomorrow but they look
> good.
Sure - take your time.
> > One variant would be what Fujita suggested: you could pull
> > core/iommu as a basis (it's a well-tested, problem-free tree at
> > the moment, with no big risky items), and then pull/apply the
> > powerpc specific bits from Fujita.
>
> Or we can have the patches in core/iommu and I pull the whole
> thing in powerpc-next. [...]
Ok! We could also stage it a bit (one or two weeks) in a separate
branch and allow a rebase, should you find any bugs during testing?
Ingo
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
