On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 13:01 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > We don't actually want kmemleak to track the lmb allocations, so we > pass min_count as 0. However telling kmemleak about lmb allocations > allows it to scan that memory for pointers to other memory that is > tracked by kmemleak, ie. slab allocations etc.
Looks alright to me (though I haven't tested it). You can add a Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> -- Catalin _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev