In message: <[email protected]> Stuart Yoder <[email protected]> writes: : > Lets *not* do it on power.org. I'd like to see the bindings used by : > more than just powerpc people, and power.org might become a bit of a : > mental barrier for non-powerpc folks. kernel.org would be a good : > host. So would ozlabs or infradead. Or I'd be happy to maintain one : > on secretlab. : : I think broadening it beyond power.org is good. Along those lines I'd prefer : not having this on kernel.org, as device trees are not Linux-centric. There : are other OS vendors I've interacted with that I'd like to see use device trees : and separating it from Linux may be better IMO.
I know of at least one other free OS that will be migrating to device trees for enumeration of devices in the embedded space... Warner _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
