Hello Ben, > Have you considered switching to my proposed device-tree based clock > reprentation ?
You mean this one? http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/31551/ Sorry, I have missed it up to now :( While I think (after one glimpse) this moves things into the right direction, my priority at the moment is to get the mscan driver working on 512x (and then to mainline). For that, I needed the patch I posted. I hope I can have another look at your proposal later on, it looks really worth it. Until then I'd propose to consider this patch as it fixes a bug in clock assignment. But I leave the final decision to you maintainers, of course. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
