2010/1/16 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <linuxppc-...@ml.breakpoint.cc>: > This is take two :) > SMP support did not work in the first one and due to the lack of a working > SMP machine it is still absent. I took the e500v1 problem into account and > the result is that I now use multiple 256MiB mappings. > The final mapping covers the first 2GiB so the part of the highmem should > be also covered and not just kernel memory. > > The first three patches prepare the entry code to work outside of the > first page. Patch 4 simply moves code and finally patch 5 implements the > kexec functionality.
Hi, sebastian Is it possible to avoid setting up the 1:1 mapping but to convert physical address into virt before relocate , like mips do? 2010/1/16 Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org>: > > What do you think we need for SMP support? I'm happy to test out on SMP HW > (8572) > I'm happy to test it too :D _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
