Dear Heiko, thanks for running the tests.
In message <4b8f8bb4.6070...@denx.de> you wrote: > > here the results: > > run version > > 1-4 2.6.33-rc6 without your patches > 5-8 2.6.33-rc6 with all your patches > 9-12 2.6.33-rc6 with patches 1,2 and 4 (without 8xx: Don't touch ACCESSED > when no SWAP) > 13-16 2.6.33-rc6 with all your patches and CONFIG_PIN_TLB=y So CONFIG_PIN_TLB imroves the performance as expected, while the other patches don;t show any measurable improvememt - or am I reading the results incorrectly? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de And now remains That we find out the cause of this effect, Or rather say, the cause of this defect... -- Hamlet, Act II, Scene 2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
