On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 09:20:08AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:52 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > I get the following during boot on a 16 CPU Power box.  Thoughts?
> > (/proc/config attached)
> 
> Wow... looks like the preempt count of the idle task got busted or
> something ... how reproduceable ? Something like a record of previous
> interrupts might be useful..

I have seen it only once, but it did get my attention.  I will try running
it again this evening when/if kernel-ml8 is free again.  2.6.35-rc2,
I should have mentioned.

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> Cheers,
> Ben.
> 
> >                                                     Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > UDP hash table entries: 2048 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
> > UDP-Lite hash table entries: 2048 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
> > NET: Registered protocol family 1
> > RPC: Registered udp transport module.
> > RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
> > RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 backchannel transport module.
> > Trying to unpack rootfs image as initramfs...
> > Freeing initrd memory: 2455k freed
> > BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000002
> > no locks held by swapper/0.
> > Modules linked in:
> > Call Trace:
> > [c00000008e1afc20] [c000000000011990] .show_stack+0x70/0x184 (unreliable)
> > [c00000008e1afcd0] [c00000000005cb60] .__schedule_bug+0xac/0xd0
> > [c00000008e1afd70] [c0000000005f0c34] .schedule+0xc0/0x894
> > [c00000008e1afe40] [c0000000000142d0] .cpu_idle+0x1f8/0x20c
> > [c00000008e1afed0] [c000000000600b08] .start_secondary+0x3bc/0x3fc
> > [c00000008e1aff90] [c000000000008264] .start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
> > BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000002
> > no locks held by swapper/0.
> > Modules linked in:
> > Call Trace:
> > [c00000008e1afc20] [c000000000011990] .show_stack+0x70/0x184 (unreliable)
> > [c00000008e1afcd0] [c00000000005cb60] .__schedule_bug+0xac/0xd0
> > [c00000008e1afd70] [c0000000005f0c34] .schedule+0xc0/0x894
> > [c00000008e1afe40] [c0000000000142d0] .cpu_idle+0x1f8/0x20c
> > [c00000008e1afed0] [c000000000600b08] .start_secondary+0x3bc/0x3fc
> > [c00000008e1aff90] [c000000000008264] .start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
> > BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000002
> > no locks held by swapper/0.
> > Modules linked in:
> > Call Trace:
> > [c00000008e1afc20] [c000000000011990] .show_stack+0x70/0x184 (unreliable)
> > [c00000008e1afcd0] [c00000000005cb60] .__schedule_bug+0xac/0xd0
> > [c00000008e1afd70] [c0000000005f0c34] .schedule+0xc0/0x894
> > [c00000008e1afe40] [c0000000000142d0] .cpu_idle+0x1f8/0x20c
> > [c00000008e1afed0] [c000000000600b08] .start_secondary+0x3bc/0x3fc
> > [c00000008e1aff90] [c000000000008264] .start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
> > BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000002
> > no locks held by swapper/0.
> > Modules linked in:
> > Call Trace:
> > [c00000008e1afc20] [c000000000011990] .show_stack+0x70/0x184 (unreliable)
> > [c00000008e1afcd0] [c00000000005cb60] .__schedule_bug+0xac/0xd0
> > [c00000008e1afd70] [c0000000005f0c34] .schedule+0xc0/0x894
> > [c00000008e1afe40] [c0000000000142d0] .cpu_idle+0x1f8/0x20c
> > [c00000008e1afed0] [c000000000600b08] .start_secondary+0x3bc/0x3fc
> > [c00000008e1aff90] [c000000000008264] .start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
> > audit: initializing netlink socket (disabled)
> > type=2000 audit(1276043741.388:1): initialized
> > BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000002
> > no locks held by swapper/0.
> > Modules linked in:
> > Call Trace:
> > [c00000008e1afc20] [c000000000011990] .show_stack+0x70/0x184 (unreliable)
> > [c00000008e1afcd0] [c00000000005cb60] .__schedule_bug+0xac/0xd0
> > [c00000008e1afd70] [c0000000005f0c34] .schedule+0xc0/0x894
> > [c00000008e1afe40] [c0000000000142d0] .cpu_idle+0x1f8/0x20c
> > [c00000008e1afed0] [c000000000600b08] .start_secondary+0x3bc/0x3fc
> > [c00000008e1aff90] [c000000000008264] .start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
> > BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000002
> > no locks held by swapper/0.
> > Modules linked in:
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to