On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:54:59AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 12:21:45PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: > > > Meanwhile I tested the per-cpu breakpoints with the new emulate_step > > patch (refer linuxppc-dev message-id: > > 20100602112903.gb30...@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com) and they continue to fail > > due to emulate_step() failure, in my case, on a "lwz r0,0(r28)" > > instruction. > > You need to pass the instruction word to emulate_step(), not the > instruction address. Also you need to have the full GPR set > available. The patch below fixes these problems. I'll fold these > changes into your patch 2/5. > > Paul.
The breakpoints that used to fail before (due to emulate_step() failure) are now working fine upon applying this patch. Please include this patch along with my 2/5 as indicated by you. Thanks, K.Prasad _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
