Hi Timur,
> +/**
> + * Global Utility Registers.
> + *
> + * Not all registers defined in this structure are available on all chips, so
> + * you are expected to know whether a given register actually exists on your
> + * chip before you access it.
> + *
> + * Also, some registers are similar on different chips but have slightly
> + * different names. In these cases, one name is chosen to avoid extraneous
> + * #ifdefs.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_85xx
> +struct ccsr_guts_85xx {
> +#else
> +struct ccsr_guts_86xx {
> +#endif
Is there a good reason to have 2 different names for the same structure
depending on the architecture? I'd think keeping a common "ccsr_guts"
name would get rid of the ifdefs above as well as in code that can be
used on both 85xx and 86xx processors down the road.
Best,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
