On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:14:14PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Anatolij Gustschin <ag...@denx.de> wrote: > > Hi Grant, > > > > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:16:08 -0600 > > Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Anatolij Gustschin <ag...@denx.de> wrote: > >> > The driver creates platform devices based on the information > >> > from USB nodes in the flat device tree. This is the replacement > >> > for old arch fsl_soc usb code removed by the previous patch. > >> > It uses usual of-style binding, available EHCI-HCD and UDC > >> > drivers can be bound to the created devices. The new of-style > >> > driver additionaly instantiates USB OTG platform device, as the > >> > appropriate USB OTG driver will be added soon. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <ag...@denx.de> > >> > Cc: Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> > >> > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> > >> > >> Hi Anatolij, > >> > >> Looks pretty good, but some comments below. > > > > Thanks for review and comments! Greg already merged this series and > > therefore I'll submit an incremental cleanup patch to address > > outstanding issues. My reply is below. > > Greg maintains a patchwork tree IIRC. I believe he drops patches from > his linux-next branch if they need to be reworked. Greg, do I have > this right?
Yup. I can easily drop all of these patches. > Also, my preference would be to see some 3rd party testing before > committing to having this merged. Ok, I will go drop them all now, and wait for some that pass your review. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev