On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:12 AM, Zang Roy-R61911 wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 21:19 PM >> To: Zang Roy-R61911 >> Cc: linux-...@lists.infradead.org; Wood Scott-B07421; > dedeki...@gmail.com; Lan >> Chunhe-B25806; linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; a...@linux-foundation.org; >> dw...@infradead.org; Gala Kumar-B11780 >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] P4080/eLBC: Make Freescale elbc interrupt > common to >> elbc devices >> >> >> On Oct 18, 2010, at 2:22 AM, Roy Zang wrote: >> >>> Move Freescale elbc interrupt from nand dirver to elbc driver. >>> Then all elbc devices can use the interrupt instead of ONLY nand. >>> >>> For former nand driver, it had the two functions: >>> >>> 1. detecting nand flash partitions; >>> 2. registering elbc interrupt. >>> >>> Now, second function is removed to fsl_lbc.c. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Lan Chunhe-B25806 <b25...@freescale.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Roy Zang <tie-fei.z...@freescale.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmai...@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 <b07...@freescale.com> >>> --- >> >> Roy, this is a nit, but are these really p4080 specific? just > wondering why >> the subject is P4080/eLBC:... > We start these code in P4080 project. Some customer want to track eLBC > error on P4080, but some of the code is limited in nand driver only ... > That is why P4080/eLBC ... > Roy
sure, but is anything about these patches p4080 specific? - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
