> Since then, the silence has been deafening.
> 
> My assumption now is that this is not ever getting fixed. I'm certainly not
> able to fix it. I'm not a even kernel programmer! I got far enough to
> diagnose the cause just with the "add more printk's and boot it again"
> technique. Hundreds of reboots trying to figure it out. I was a conscientious
> bug-reporter, I thought.

I'm happy to help you fix it but I'm travelling at the moment and won't
have much time for a couple of weeks.

Cheers,
Ben.

> I could pull the PCI card and be done with it. I never used those USB ports
> anyway. But after all the suffering I went through to find this bug... the
> crashing e2fsck's and consequent filesystem corruption... I hate the idea of
> surrendering to it. There are possibly other affected users who I'd be
> abandoning to suffer similarly in the future.
> 
> For the last week I've studied OpenFirmware as hard as I can. I read the spec
> cover to cover. And the USB annex, and the PCI annex. But I'm still lost in
> all the different address formats.
> 
> I took my best guess on how to handle this problem, and ran with it, ending
> up with a 97-line Forth script, and that was just to get a virtual address,
> not to actually do anything with it, and it used a hardcoded device path. But
> it didn't work, all I got was an "invalid pointer" error. I made another
> guess at something that wasn't documented anywhere (the fact that this stuff
> is insufficiently documented is the one thing I can state with complete
> confidence!) and out came a successful translation to a virtual address: 0.
> 
> If I'm the only one fighting this bug, the bug wins.
> 


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to