On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Michael Ellerman <mich...@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:02 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote: >> > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:31 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:08:02 +1100 Michael Ellerman >> > > <mich...@ellerman.id.= >> > au> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > I vote for: >> > > >=20 >> > > > -> Exception: 401 (Instruction Access) at 00000000f7937794 >> > >=20 >> > > Or: >> > >=20 >> > > =E2=98=9B Exception: 401 (Instruction Access) at 00000000f7937794 >> > >> > Let's get serious, it's _really_ like a phone call: >> > >> > =E2=98=8E Exception: 401 (Instruction Access) at 00000000f7937794 >> >> We need a dedicated NACK char! > > ␕!
Surely it would be: ☣ josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
