Em 05-04-2011 15:16, James Bottomley escreveu: > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 08:49 -0700, Greg KH wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:58:47PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> this series makes it possible to build bit-identical kernel image and >>> modules from identical sources. Of course the build is already >>> deterministic in terms of behavior of the code, but the various >>> timestamps embedded in the object files make it hard to compare two >>> builds, for instance to verify that a makefile cleanup didn't >>> accidentally change something. A prime example is /proc/config.gz, which >>> has both a timestamp in the gzip header and a timestamp in the payload >>> data. With this series applied, a script like this will produce >>> identical kernels each time: >> >> Very nice stuff. Do you want to take the individual patches through one >> of your trees, or do you mind if the subsystem maintainers take them >> through theirs? > > I'm happy for this to go through a single tree.
Me too. With respect to the patches I was c/c (patches 13, 14, 31): Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@redhat.com> Thanks, Mauro. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev