On 03/31/2011 01:38 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:21 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> No, its the same accessors for both, since the need to distinguish them >> hasn't really come up. Could you put a "if (preemptable()) return;" >> guard in your implementations? > That would be a band-aid but would probably do the trick for now > for !-rt, tho it wouldn't do the right thing for -rt...
Hi Ben, Have you had a chance to look at doing a workaround/fix for these power problems? I believe that's the only holdup to putting in the batching changes. I'd like to get them in for the next window if possible, since they're a pretty significant performance win for us. Thanks, J _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev