On Friday 17 June 2011 13:12:56 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> > I think new cpufreq drivers should live in drivers/cpufreq, not in arch/.
> > We've
> > started moving other drivers away from arch/x86 and arch/arm already.
>
> What about drivers/cpufreq/powerpc, or it's an unnecessary?
drivers/cpufreq is fine by itself, unless Dave has some preference.
> Should I resumbit it, or there will be massive arch/powerpc ->
> drivers/cpufreq move?
My recommendation would be to submit the new driver for drivers/cpufreq
directly and let Ben take care of the others at a convenient time.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
