* Kumar Gala | 2012-03-31 09:48:18 [-0500]:
Sorry for the delay Kumar, I though I allready done it.
>Yes, please do.
Here it comes.
>From 5b3e09992615e5670fa8e432e50424466fa9ca1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 21:48:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "powerpc/85xx: p2020rdb - move the NAND address."
This reverts commit 0c00f65653389a408dfbbee7578e671664eea26a.
The initial commit was my fault. There are two boards out there:
P2020RDB and P2020RDB-PC. I wasn't aware of that and assumed that I have
a RDB board in front of me while I the RDB-PC. This patch makes it work
for the RDB-PC variant and breaks it for the RDB. Now there is a device
tree file available for the RDB-PC which was not there earlier. So with
this revert, everything gets back to normal :)
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb.dts | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb.dts
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb.dts
index 153bc76..4d52bce 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb.dts
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
/* NOR and NAND Flashes */
ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xef000000 0x01000000
- 0x1 0x0 0x0 0xff800000 0x00040000
+ 0x1 0x0 0x0 0xffa00000 0x00040000
0x2 0x0 0x0 0xffb00000 0x00020000>;
nor@0,0 {
--
1.7.10
>>>> Since both system have the same SoC and the NAND_SPL is always linked
>>>> against 0xfff00000 I don't see anything wrong to relocate the NAND CS
>>>> later to 0xff800000 (or to 0xffa00000) and having it consistent among
>>>> both configs.
>>
>> what about this thing? Should leave it as it or move to the same
>> location? Since I have no HW *I* would prefer not to touch it :)
>
>Hmm, that implies a u-boot change, right?
Yup.
>- k
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
