When building with CRYPTO_SHA1_PPC enabled we fail with:
---
powerpc/crypto/sha1-powerpc-asm.S: Assembler messages:
powerpc/crypto/sha1-powerpc-asm.S:116: Error: can't resolve `0' {*ABS* section}
- `STACKFRAMESIZE' {*UND* section}
powerpc/crypto/sha1-powerpc-asm.S:116: Error: expression too complex
powerpc/crypto/sha1-powerpc-asm.S:178: Error: unsupported relocation against
STACKFRAMESIZE
---
Use INT_FRAME_SIZE instead.
Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/crypto/sha1-powerpc-asm.S | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
FWIW the SHA1_PPC makes about a 20% difference on my 32bit board
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/crypto/sha1-powerpc-asm.S
b/arch/powerpc/crypto/sha1-powerpc-asm.S
index a5f8264..125e165 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/crypto/sha1-powerpc-asm.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/crypto/sha1-powerpc-asm.S
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
STEPUP4((t)+16, fn)
_GLOBAL(powerpc_sha_transform)
- PPC_STLU r1,-STACKFRAMESIZE(r1)
+ PPC_STLU r1,-INT_FRAME_SIZE(r1)
SAVE_8GPRS(14, r1)
SAVE_10GPRS(22, r1)
@@ -175,5 +175,5 @@ _GLOBAL(powerpc_sha_transform)
REST_8GPRS(14, r1)
REST_10GPRS(22, r1)
- addi r1,r1,STACKFRAMESIZE
+ addi r1,r1,INT_FRAME_SIZE
blr
--
1.8.1.2
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
