On 05/29/2013 06:29:13 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 05/30/2013 09:14 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 05/29/2013 06:10:33 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 05/30/2013 06:05 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > But you didn't put it in the same section as
KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE. 0xe0
>> > begins a different section.
>>
>> It is not really obvious that there are sections as no comment
defines
>> those :)
>
> There is a comment /* ioctls for fds returned by KVM_CREATE_DEVICE
*/
>
> Putting KVM_CREATE_DEVICE in there was mainly to avoid dealing with
the
> ioctl number conflict mess in the vm-ioctl section, but at least
that one
> is related to the device control API. :-)
>
>> But yes, makes sense to move it up a bit and change the code to
0xad.
>
> 0xad is KVM_KVMCLOCK_CTRL
That's it. I am _completely_ confused now. No system whatsoever :(
What rule should I use in order to choose the number for my new
ioctl? :)
Yeah, it's a mess. 0xaf seems to be free. :-)
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
