On 07/01/2013 12:21:50 AM, Haijun Zhang wrote:
Add compatible of esdhc for below board:
p2041   p3041   p4080   p5020   p5040

Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang <[email protected]>
CC: Scott Wood <[email protected]>
CC: Fleming Andrew-AFLEMING <[email protected]>
---
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p2041si-post.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p3041si-post.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p4080si-post.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p5020si-post.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p5040si-post.dtsi | 1 +
 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

Is there something specific that depends on this, or are you just trying to conform to other examples?

I don't think we need the SoC name here, given that eSDHC has a version register that you can read (and an SVR in the unlikely case that that isn't adequate). If you did end up relying on this device tree change, you'd be broken if an older device trees is used.

-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to