On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:31:34PM -0500, Ryan Arnold wrote: > Adhemerval and I were just looking at the signal stack frames and I'd > noticed the increase in size due to the addition of the HTM bits so this is > great timing. > > I tried a sigstack.h patch that increased the values as you indicated and > it cleaned up the failing tst-cancel21* testcases on POWER8. I didn't try > it on POWER7 yet.
I've tested on power7 using a copy of sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/bits/sigstack.h as sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/bits/sigstack.h -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev