On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:31:47PM +0800, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote: > > > > We here suppose the reset bit would be cleared -- "The software > > > > reset will last > > > > 8 cycles." from RM, so if this happened to be a failure, the whole > > > > IP module won't be normally working as well. > > > > > > Also add a comment describing this against why cycle = 1000 is selected. > > > > If it is done in 8 cycles, 1000-cycle will be surely a safe value for it. > > As long as it finished in 8 cycles, it would quit anyway. Why against? > > I am not against, I am saying why it was not 200 or 50 or 20 etc. I am saying > that write a comment saying this much is sufficient as per specification and > so keep 1000/etc as preservative.
I did't mean that. The 'against' is from "Also add a comment describing this 'against' why cycle = 1000 is selected." Well, if you insist this extra comment for easy-understand, I'll add them Thank you. Nicolin Chen _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
