> -----Original Message----- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 1:57 AM > To: Jia Hongtao-B38951 > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [V2,2/2] powerpc/85xx: workaround for chips with MSI > hardware errata > > On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 23:00 -0500, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jia Hongtao-B38951 > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:36 PM > > > To: Wood Scott-B07421 > > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: [V2,2/2] powerpc/85xx: workaround for chips with MSI > > > hardware errata > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > > > Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 10:29 AM > > > > To: Jia Hongtao-B38951 > > > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Wood > > > > Scott- > > > > B07421 > > > > Subject: Re: [V2,2/2] powerpc/85xx: workaround for chips with MSI > > > > hardware errata > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:03:18AM +0800, Hongtao Jia wrote: > > > > > The MPIC version 2.0 has a MSI errata (errata PIC1 of mpc8544), > > > > > It causes that neither MSI nor MSI-X can work fine. This is a > > > > > workaround to allow MSI-X to function properly. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Shuo <[email protected]> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Li Yang <[email protected]> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Building on 83xx: > > > > > > > > arch/powerpc/sysdev/built-in.o: In function `fsl_of_msi_probe': > > > > fsl_msi.c:(.text+0x1464): undefined reference to > > > > `fsl_mpic_primary_get_version' > > > > make[1]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 > > > > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > > > > > > > fsl_msi.c supports IPIC as well. > > > > > > > > -Scott > > > > > > Hi Scott, > > > I updated the patch to fix this compile error just now. > > > please refer to: > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/256018/ > > > > > > Thanks. > > > -Hongtao > > > > Hi Scott, > > > > The 83xx compile issue has already been fixed. > > Please have a review on this patch. > > Oh, sorry -- I missed it because it was marked "Changes Requested". > I've changed the status and will consider it for the next batch of "next" > patches. > > In the future, if a patch is miscategorized in patchwork (e.g. says > "changes requested" when there is no longer a need to submit a new > patch) please mention that specifically and provide the patchwork URL. > > -Scott >
Ok, got it. Sorry for your inconvenient. -Hongtao _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
