On 10/08/2013 09:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:00:26AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> Right now the `config_bhrb` PMU specific call happens after write_mmcr0 >> which actually enables the PMU for event counting and interrupt. So >> there is a small window of time where the PMU and BHRB runs without the >> required HW branch filter (if any) enabled in BHRB. This can cause some >> of the branch samples to be collected through BHRB without any filter >> being applied and hence affecting the correctness of the results. This >> patch moves the BHRB config function call before enabling the interrupts. > > Patch looks good. > > But it reminds me I have an item in my TODO list: > - "Why can't config_bhrb() be done in compute_mmcr()" ? >
compute_mmcr() function deals with generic MMCR* configs for normal PMU events. Even if BHRB config touches MMCRA register, it's configuration does not interfere with the PMU config for general events. So its best to keep them separate. Besides, we can always look at these code consolidation issues in future. But this patch solves a problem which is happening right now. Regards Anshuman _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev