On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 12:31 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Michael Ellerman [mich...@ellerman.id.au] wrote:
> | bool is_load_store(int ext_opcode)
> | {
> | upper = ext_opcode >> 5;
> | lower = ext_opcode & 0x1f;
> |
> | /* Short circuit as many misses as we can */
> | if (lower < 3 || lower > 23)
> | return false;
>
> I see some loads/stores like these which are not covered by
> the above check. Is it ok to ignore them ?
>
> lower == 29: ldepx, stdepx, eviddepx, evstddepx
>
> lower == 31: lwepx, lbepx, lfdepx, stfdepx,
Those are the external process ID instructions, which I've never heard
of anyone using, I think we can ignore them.
> Looking through the opcode maps, I also see these for primary
> op code 4:
>
> evldd, evlddx, evldwx, evldw, evldh, evldhx.
>
> Should we include those also ?
Yes I think so. I didn't check any of the other opcodes for you.
cheers
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
