> > > That shows the dividers as being somewhere in between the PLL and the > MUX. > > > The MUX is where the divider is selected. There's nothing in the > > > PLL's programming interface that relates to the dividers. As such > > > it's simpler to model it as being part of the MUX. > > > > > > -Scott > > > > > I don't know whether it is simpler, but "modeling divider as being part > of the MUX" > > is your guess, right? > > If the "divider" is included in MUX, the MUX would not be called "MUX". > > It's still selecting from multiple PLLs. > > > I don't know whether "divider" module exists or not. If it exists, it > > should be part of PLL or between PLL and MUX. wherever it was, the > device tree binding is appropriate. > > The device tree binding is unnecessarily complicated. > > > The P3041RM shows exactly each PLL has 2 outputs which definitely have > no "divider" at all. > > That diagram is a bit weird -- one of the outputs is used as is, and the > other is split into 1/2 and 1/4. It doesn't really matter though; the > end result is the same. We're describing the programming interface, not > artwork choices in the manual. > > -Scott > If the device tree needs to be modified, could you give me your suggestions?
Regards, Yuantian _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
