Hi Ben, On 31/10/13 05:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:53 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanage...@arm.com> >> >> Since the definition of_find_next_cache_node is architecture independent, >> the existing definition in powerpc can be moved to driver/of/base.c >> >> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> >> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@linaro.org> >> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herr...@calxeda.com> >> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanage...@arm.com> > > I've seen no follow up on that, I'm happy to stick it in powerpc-next > with some other late stuff. >
Thanks for the follow up. Grant wanted to see usage of this outside PPC and I pointed him[0] to the RFC[1] I had posted to support cacheinfo on ARM. These patches are based on v3.12-rc1, let me know if you want me to rebase/repost on any particular version. Regards, Sudeep [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg05174.html [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/340 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
