On 01/14/2014 11:35 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> On PowerPC, in a particular test scenario, all the cpu idle states were 
> disabled.
> Inspite of this it was observed that the idle state count of the shallowest
> idle state, snooze, was increasing.
> 
> This is because the governor returns the idle state index as 0 even in
> scenarios when no idle state can be chosen. These scenarios could be when the
> latency requirement is 0 or as mentioned above when the user wants to disable
> certain cpu idle states at runtime. In the latter case, its possible that no
> cpu idle state is valid because the suitable states were disabled
> and the rest did not match the menu governor criteria to be chosen as the
> next idle state.
> 
> This patch adds the code to indicate that a valid cpu idle state could not be
> chosen by the menu governor and reports back to arch so that it can take some
> default action.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy <pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deep...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> 
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c        |    6 +++++-
>  drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c |    7 ++++---
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> index a55e68f..5bf06bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -131,8 +131,9 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
> 
>       /* ask the governor for the next state */
>       next_state = cpuidle_curr_governor->select(drv, dev);
> +
> +     dev->last_residency = 0;
>       if (need_resched()) {
> -             dev->last_residency = 0;
>               /* give the governor an opportunity to reflect on the outcome */
>               if (cpuidle_curr_governor->reflect)
>                       cpuidle_curr_governor->reflect(dev, next_state);
> @@ -140,6 +141,9 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
>               return 0;
>       }
> 
> +     if (next_state < 0)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
>       trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(next_state, dev->cpu);
> 
>       broadcast = !!(drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP);
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c 
> b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> index cf7f2f0..6921543 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ again:
>   * menu_select - selects the next idle state to enter
>   * @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data
>   * @dev: the CPU
> + * Returns -1 when no idle state is suitable
>   */
>  static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device 
> *dev)
>  {
> @@ -292,17 +293,17 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, 
> struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>       int multiplier;
>       struct timespec t;
> 
> -     if (data->needs_update) {
> +     if (data->last_state_idx >= 0 && data->needs_update) {
>               menu_update(drv, dev);
>               data->needs_update = 0;
>       }
> 
> -     data->last_state_idx = 0;
> +     data->last_state_idx = -1;
>       data->exit_us = 0;
> 
>       /* Special case when user has set very strict latency requirement */
>       if (unlikely(latency_req == 0))
> -             return 0;
> +             return data->last_state_idx;
> 
>       /* determine the expected residency time, round up */
>       t = ktime_to_timespec(tick_nohz_get_sleep_length());
> 

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to