Liu ping fan <kernelf...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V > <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> Liu ping fan <kernelf...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11.12.2013, at 09:47, Liu Ping Fan <kernelf...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> This series is based on Aneesh's series "[PATCH -V2 0/5] powerpc: mm: >>>>> Numa faults support for ppc64" >>>>> >>>>> For this series, I apply the same idea from the previous thread "[PATCH >>>>> 0/3] optimize for powerpc _PAGE_NUMA" >>>>> (for which, I still try to get a machine to show nums) >>>>> >>>>> But for this series, I think that I have a good justification -- the fact >>>>> of heavy cost when switching context between guest and host, >>>>> which is well known. >>>> >>>> This cover letter isn't really telling me anything. Please put a proper >>>> description of what you're trying to achieve, why you're trying to achieve >>>> what you're trying and convince your readers that it's a good idea to do >>>> it the way you do it. >>>> >>> Sorry for the unclear message. After introducing the _PAGE_NUMA, >>> kvmppc_do_h_enter() can not fill up the hpte for guest. Instead, it >>> should rely on host's kvmppc_book3s_hv_page_fault() to call >>> do_numa_page() to do the numa fault check. This incurs the overhead >>> when exiting from rmode to vmode. My idea is that in >>> kvmppc_do_h_enter(), we do a quick check, if the page is right placed, >>> there is no need to exit to vmode (i.e saving htab, slab switching) >> >> Can you explain more. Are we looking at hcall from guest and >> hypervisor handling them in real mode ? If so why would guest issue a >> hcall on a pte entry that have PAGE_NUMA set. Or is this about >> hypervisor handling a missing hpte, because of host swapping this page >> out ? In that case how we end up in h_enter ? IIUC for that case we >> should get to kvmppc_hpte_hv_fault. >> > After setting _PAGE_NUMA, we should flush out all hptes both in host's > htab and guest's. So when guest tries to access memory, host finds > that there is not hpte ready for guest in guest's htab. And host > should raise dsi to guest.
Now guest receive that fault, removes the PAGE_NUMA bit and do an hpte_insert. So before we do an hpte_insert (or H_ENTER) we should have cleared PAGE_NUMA bit. >This incurs that guest ends up in h_enter. > And you can see in current code, we also try this quick path firstly. > Only if fail, we will resort to slow path -- kvmppc_hpte_hv_fault. hmm ? hpte_hv_fault is the hypervisor handling the fault. -aneesh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev