On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> powernv in the subject of the patch?
Crap. You're right.
That's what you get when posting patches while attending a meeting.
>
> Regards
> Preeti U Murthy
> On 02/06/2014 07:46 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > The core idle loop now takes care of it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <n...@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 7 ++-----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> > index 1c0a9be2ff..9cce0098f4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
> > #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/cpu.h>
> > -#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> > #include <linux/elfcore.h>
> > #include <linux/pm.h>
> > #include <linux/tick.h>
> > @@ -94,10 +93,8 @@ void arch_cpu_idle(void)
> > * This should do all the clock switching and wait for interrupt
> > * tricks
> > */
> > - if (cpuidle_idle_call()) {
> > - cpu_do_idle();
> > - local_irq_enable();
> > - }
> > + cpu_do_idle();
> > + local_irq_enable();
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
